Measured Outcomes. Meaningful Recovery.

If you’ve seen several doctors, tried different treatments, or even undergone prior surgery without lasting relief, you’re not alone. Many of our patients come to us after a long journey. My practice focuses on complex shoulder, elbow, and knee cases—patients who often begin treatment with more pain and worse function than national averages.

Through careful evaluation, advanced techniques, and ongoing measurement, I strive to help every patient move from frustration to progress—step by step.

Transparent Results

Matthew Fury, MD

Shoulder Function (SANE Scores)

Patient-reported shoulder rating

Patients under my care typically begin with more severe shoulder limitations than national comparison groups (baseline ≈ 28 vs 42 points).
By one year post-operation, their average SANE score reaches 83, outperforming national benchmarks (~73).

Interpretation:
Even though these are often revision or highly complex cases, patients experience greater improvement than the national norm—evidence of precise surgical planning and execution coupled with data-driven rehabilitation.

Knee Function (IKDC Scores)

Validated outcome measure for knee stability and activity

My knee patients often start below national baselines, yet by one year they show substantial, above-average functional improvement, surpassing national benchmarks for similar procedures.

Interpretation:
These recovery curves reflect a commitment to individualized care focused on stability restoration and meniscal preservation. This approach allows us to return patients back to performance after even the most complex knee reconstructions and revisions.

Shoulder + Elbow Function (ASES Scores)

Comprehensive measure of pain and performance across shoulder and elbow conditions

Patients with shoulder and elbow disorders in my care begin below average but achieve higher one-year outcomes than national peers.

Interpretation:
This demonstrates balanced excellence across both shoulder and elbow procedures, including Tommy John / UCL surgeries and throwing athlete care, supported by validated outcome tracking.

Summary of Personal Results

Why This Matters to Patients

These outcomes show that—even for complex or revision cases—meaningful improvement is achievable. We measure every result because data should guide care, not ego and not the status quo. My goal is to provide each patient the best possible chance at recovery, function, performance, and confidence.

Data Integrity and Benchmarking

• Outcomes reflect Matthew Fury, MD’s personal surgical cases

• Benchmarked against a national dataset and regional norms

• Uses validated patient-reported outcome measures (SANE, IKDC, ASES, and others)

• Updated regularly to maintain transparency and continuous improvement

For Patients Seeking Expert-Level, Evidence-Based Care

We work to obtain the best outcomes for our patients, adapting our practice to real-time data as well as new evidence across the field. We treat elite athletes and complex revision cases with a similar mindset—applying evidence-driven, compassionate care to return our patients to peak performance.